Sunday, May 22, 2016

The Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Debate About Stephen Curry versus LeBron James

When I was a kid and missed a day of school, I would sit on the couch and watch the flagship program of ESPN for hours. From catching up on the highlights from last night to then trying to recall and emulate the best phrases of the day from Stuart Scott, Dan Patrick, or whoever anchored the desk on the particular day, this exercise was a cherished routine. It's a different story today when I watch SportsCenter because the show is almost always live. This is vital for breaking news. It seamlessly allows for player interviews and guests to deliver their thoughts on air. Promotions can reach a whole different level, too. But the format lends itself to a major problem of having hours of airtime to fill with only a limited amount of material to discuss. Analysts can only analyze for so long. What follows analysis these days? Scorching, scalding, and sweltering hot takes in spades.

This brings me to what I want to examine: The comparison of LeBron James and Stephen Curry to determine who is the superior player. The debate has been nonstop since last June. The examination has reached a microscopic level during Curry's record-breaking annihilating season and the playoffs in anticipation of an extremely likely Finals rematch. That's why I'm afraid in the coming days the conversation is going to dominate the sports media. It's tempting, especially with players of this caliber, to turn this into the one and only story. However, we need to take a step back and realize how fruitless this talk is. 

First off, the narratives these two have written are both spectacular. Simply appreciate them both, which for some unbeknownst reason seems to be an impossible option. From his high school days, the prophetical anointing of LeBron James was borderline blasphemous. When the Cavaliers won the lottery and the right to draft the Chosen One, it was miraculous. When the Prodigal Son returned to Cleveland, the city's tepid hopes for a championship were resurrected to a frenzy. His accolades racked up in Northeast Ohio and South Beach are remarkable- besides the blemish of a 2-4 record in the Finals- and have cemented him among the greatest players of all time. It would be hard to design a more perfect specimen for the game of basketball than LeBron. For Curry, the questions and doubters were never afraid to raise their voices. The Bay Area, home to many of the country's biggest innovations and venture capitalists this millennium, took a chance on the Davidson College product. Today, the Warriors' return on investment can't even begin to be quantified. That's what happens when you lead your team to a 73-9 record, make over 400 three pointers in one season, and become the first unanimous MVP in league history. Stephen Curry is the architect of a revolution on how to dominate and defy what's possible in basketball. The overlap of their careers should be considered a stroke of tremendous luck. 

The ways their teams have been viewed in breaking the wills of opponents makes a comparison even more difficult. The cutting and motion offense of the Warriors seemingly predicates passing up uncontested layups for wide open three pointers. When Golden State employs their "Group of Death" lineup, the philosophy leads to a brand of basketball the rest of the NBA is desperately attempting to replicate. Whether it's a behind the back pass to an open Klay Thompson, pick and pop with Draymond Green, or celebrating a 30 foot three pointer before it goes in, Curry is the maestro of this trendy orchestra. His scoring ensures the ensemble stays in key and in rhythm. The Cavaliers have tried to add this dimension and become more versatile by signing a barrage of shooters to spread the floor around LeBron, but their offense is at the best when this brute, unstoppable force is leading the charge of his teammates to the basket, completing passes very few point guards would dare attempt, or attacking the glass on defense. In a way, Curry and James have become champions and the poster children for this new age versus old school approach. Basketball pundits both past and present have been weighing in all season. What's developed is the success of their teams provides merits for who's the better player, while the failure of their teams acts as indignation against their case. Changing the debate's framework from individual performance to team result leads to no meaningful answer on the original question, which is a lesson ESPN can't seem to grasp. 

Finally, an often cited point in Curry's defense is he's the face of the NBA nowadays. From jersey sales, to advertisements, to his family, it's hard to find a more popular suitor for the throne. The parables of the Warriors guard creates a David-like mythology in a career of slaying both literal and metaphorical Goliaths. This is easy and a lot of fun to root for. Many fans have happily gravitated towards his suave personality. LeBron has been vilified throughout his career for The Decision, his on court antics, maintaining friendly relationship with players around the league, and failing in the biggest moments too many times. However, where he was most hated as recent as two years ago is now home of his staunchest defenders which ultimately makes this a moot point. Besides the fact off court marketability has nothing to do with on court play, the city of Cleveland's allegiance to LeBron James is almost impossible to grasp for outsiders. A championship won by him for his city could only begin to be adequately appreciated by select pockets of long suffering and tortured fans across the country. Oh, and that's without even mentioning LeBron signed a life long deal with Nike worth ONE BILLION DOLLARS. Business, and more specifically money, normally does the most valuable talking, but in this case it's undoubtedly the most ridiculous point in this confusing debate. 

In the coming days, the rematch between the Warriors and Cavaliers will hopefully come to fruition. Not to determine whether Steph or LeBron is better, but to see the two most talented teams in the NBA from top to bottom go to war for a championship. The talk will mainly circle around the game's most exciting players, but tune out, mute, and ignore any talk when it turns to comparing and ranking the two players among all time greats. Andre Iguodala was the Finals MVP last season. Matthew Dellavedova was the key for the Cavs winning their two games. With all due respect to two of the game's present day legends, whoever wins Golden State-Cleveland Round Two will need exemplary performances from every single player on the roster. 


J. Nave







Thursday, May 5, 2016

The Write in Candidates Who Can Save the 2016 Election

After months of incessant coverage, comical debates, anatomy lessons, and literally so much more I don't think I could ever attempt to note it all, it appears the 2016 Presidential Election will come down to a contest between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Many Americans will go to the voting booth in November with a dilemma of attempting to select the lesser of two evils. A career politician who might be indicted by the FBI against a loose cannon businessman who might blow up the planet on a day where he gets insulted on Twitter isn't exactly an appealing match-up. What can be done about this? We, as the American people, can rally behind a person above the nonsensical fray that has enveloped the country the past year. An individual who will truly make America great again. There's still much time to discuss the savior of our nation. But I have a few suggestions of who we should consider.

Honorable Mention: John Kasich
What was wrong with him, Republican voters?

5. Kanye West
I know he said he didn't want to run until 2020, but why not get him elected as soon as possible? Making a follow up album to The Life of Pablo and fashion shows will soon bore the godly mogul. Leader of the free world would probably pose a few more challenges, and the American people could follow right along on Twitter with the play-by-play rationale behind his sound(?) decisions. Kim Kardashian as First Lady would boost the E! Network's ratings to record numbers. It'll be even better when he announces himself as his running mate. A Kanye cabinet would be such a motley crew of arrogance the rest of the world would have no choice but to recognize American greatness, but there's an chance he names himself to every position in his cabinet, too. He's been a vital figure in getting Panda integrated in our culture these past several weeks. Graduating from the stratosphere of celebrity mecca to the White House? Welcome to the good life, President West.

4. Kobe Bryant
Ever since he dropped 60 in his final NBA game, respect for Kobe Bryant has been at an all time high. His Black Mamba nickname would easily weave together with the "Join or Die" symbol from the American revolution in a time where it would appear our country is desperate for another. Plus, what is Kobe supposed to do in his retirement anyways? He loves the limelight. He doesn't shy away from the big time. He'll stroll into the Middle East and meet the leaders of ISIS face to face. He'll play Putin one on one for control of nuclear access codes in the Far East. He'll talk to every man, woman, and child until their fears about the current status of America are alleviated. He could assemble a council of elders with some of the world's best statesmen, mainly just for show though, because we all know he's not giving them any shot at real responsibility. Shaq as his running mate? Phil Jackson as his running mate? I'm on board with this idea. Kobe will bring championship glory to the nation's capital once again?


3. Adam Silver
The NBA commissioner has only held his position for a brief time, but his reign of power has led to some impressive accomplishments. First, he handled the Donald Sterling issue tremendously (Basically, Sterling was making comments not all too distant from what Trump has been saying on the campaign trail. Now, he no longer owns the Los Angeles Clippers thanks to actions spearheaded by Silver). Then, he came out in support of legalizing sports betting, an issue that is dear and near to my heart and could easily get solved within his first 100 days in office. Granted, Silver's strong resemblance to the male character in the 20th century painting American Gothic doesn't give him the most presidential appearance, but as a country, we should be willing to look past that in the year 2016. He graduated from the University of Chicago Law School and previously worked as a clerk for a United States District Court judge. That alone is almost enough of a resume to seek political office. Us Americans love our sports. Silver is by far the most competent leader we have of a league that is starting to dominate the news headlines all year round and in a much more positive light than the NFL. Adam Silver gives us the best shot at making sure the United States of America starts winning more golds on the global stage.

2. Cersei Lannister
I had a hard time wrestling with the top three picks and deciding who I ultimately wanted to throw my weight behind. Cersei was an infinitesimally close second. The Queen Regent of Westeros hasn't ever been in charge of the Seven Kingdoms, but she's managed to finagle and maintain a position of power where she got her husband killed, manipulated her firstborn son, and appears ready to do the same to her second to rid Kings Landing of her own rabid creation. She has a mountainous, gold clad bodyguard who will and can kill any enemy of hers without exuding any effort. She sits around all day and does nothing but drink wine, and she still manages to advance her political agenda. She walked through the capital completely naked to atone for her sins as she was physically and verbally bombarded. Do you see Trump or Clinton walking across the national mall in a fashion like this?!? Besides her previous relationship with her brother, Cersei is a perfect candidate. She's from a family of political royalty that could rival Bush or Clinton, she's conniving enough to get deals struck in Washington, she has plenty of gold dragons to pay off the national debt, and she'll love this country as much as she loves her children and Cabernet. On a side note, if we elect a fictional candidate president, what exactly happens? Lena Headey is English, so she would technically be unable to hold the position. I firmly believe Cersei, portrayed by Headey and funded by American corporations HBO and Time Warner, should be allowed to protect and serve us from the long winter ahead.

1. Lin-Manuel Miranda
Sometimes the answer is so obvious we almost miss it. If there's a better candidate out there, I dare you to find him or her. Let's run down why:

-He single-handedly created Hamilton. This musical has been 1989 meets Star Wars: The Force Awakens meets Woodstock in terms of the buzz, reach, and commercial success. Track record of improving the country? Check.
-Previously, he created In The Heights, a production that took the theatrical world by storm just to a slightly lesser degree. By no means am I a patron of the arts or a thespian, but I've listened to both soundtracks and thoroughly enjoyed them. Being consistent enough to perform well for two terms? Check.
-He has been invited to the White House to not only perform and showcase his lyrical genius, but also to discuss a plan to help Puerto Rico's current financial position. He went in front of Congress as well for the same issue. Political awareness and passion? Check.
-Can you imagine Miranda's State of the Union addresses? We'd have to create a new word in our language because lit wouldn't describe them adequately. I would learn so much about the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Iranian nuclear agreements, and national tax code if they were delivered in the fashion of the video above. Ability to captivate an audience? Check.
-At only 36 years old, Miranda could weave together an opera to delight the ears of the American youth who seem to be more interested in politics than ever before, yet his knowledge of the country's history would resonate with older voters. Connecting with his constituents? Check.
-People fork over hundreds of dollars to see Hamilton. Why not expand the show on a global horizon? Within about three months of shows and a bidding war between the most elite and wealthy individuals around the world, the national deficit could feasibly turn into a surplus. A fiscally responsible choice? Yes.
-Is he under investigation from the FBI? Is he one of the least inspiring public speakers to ever seek America's highest office? No.
-Is he prone to making poor decisions with his speech that incite riots? Does he have an awful spray tan paired with awful hair? No.
-Did this whole article start out as satire but gradually convince me Miranda could run against a former Empire State senator and an Empire State businessman and carry New York? Yes.
-Can he win the 2016 Election? Only if we rally behind him and give him the chance he deserves.

#ImWithLin

J. Nave